So I was all set. I had my topic approved. I submitted a letter to the Dean of College of Education to request a consultation regarding my thesis. She sent me to Ma'am Gomez, from the Department of Special Education. Before I went to see Ma'am Gomez, I was already having doubts on my topic (after some initial research in Educ Lib and too much googling.) When she said inclusion (children with disabilities are in the same classroom as those without disabilities) is what is now recommended in books, that made me decide not to pursue the topic. I mean, why would I design an architecture they're not gonna need anyway? It's not like I'm designing a table centerpiece.
The weekend before that meeting, I had, like I said, been googling too much. So I stumbled upon this site, which made my heart skip a beat! Eureka! I never had that feeling with my approved topic, the school for the multisensory impaired. I wasn't as happy and enthusiastic about it as I was in the thought (though it was just a thought then and I haven't even made a proposal) of creating something for the writers community, more specifically for the children's book writers and illustrators. So I emailed the two names on the site requesting if they could be my client and blah blah blah. And gah, heart attack when the regional adviser replied just after about an hour or two!
Ito na 'yun eh. Architecture + Early Childhood Learning + Literature + Creative Industry. I got really excited by the thought. So a week after they approved of my "School for the Multisensory Impaired," I submitted another topic proposal:
Emergent Literacy: Mutable Spaces and Multi-site Architecture
To design an effective learning space for children’s literacy development and a creative collaborative environment for writers, illustrators and other artists and professionals involved in children literature.
The research aims to know how to design an environment that will increase children’s interest in literature, to motivate them not only to read but recognize and appreciate the value of literature in their lives, to promote integrated literacy in early childhood learning, and to foster a creative collaborative environment and a vibrant community for the people behind the books these children read.
I went to my professor's office and submitted it, he approved it right after reading it and recommended some professionals who could help me, one from the Reading Education Area from Educ and the other from Child Psychology.
I had to admit that the idea was still sketchy in my mind. It wasn't clear exactly what it is I'm building, but I was sure what I'm going to do. So when asked, "What exactly are you building?" I didn't have a ready answer. I guess there's just no word for it yet.
I had to admit that the idea was still sketchy in my mind. It wasn't clear exactly what it is I'm building, but I was sure what I'm going to do. So when asked, "What exactly are you building?" I didn't have a ready answer. I guess there's just no word for it yet.